Signs are selected from a paradigm — a set of possible signs in a given category, such as nouns, jackets, colours. Here we have a white not Asian or Black for example child not a man, not an adolescent, not a grandfather , with a McDonald's bib not a different bib , and so on. These are combined along the syntagm — in a sentence, this would be the linear order of the words, but in an image it is the spatial arrangement. Because on the paradigmatic and syntagmatic axes elements have been selected and combined, it is often illuminating to consider what elements were not selected, and how a different combination would have changed the meaning.
All the advertisement actually shows denotes is a fairly plump-looking baby, probably between 12 and 18 months old, wearing a McDonald's bib and a paper hat with an image of chips printed on it.
Key Terms in Semiotics provides exactly the information that a student needs when encountering semiotics for the first time or as a more advanced reader. Below are some brief definitions of semiotic terms, beginning with the smallest unit Denotation: the most basic or literal meaning of a sign, e.g., the word "rose" .
So it would be quite possible to read this as an advertisement for McDonald's itself, or as a children's party invitation, or a family snap. They are known for their anti-consumption campaigns such as Buy Nothing Day, and TV Turnoff Week, as well as for their parodies of advertisements by international corporations, such as this one.
This multimodal text condenses into a single image current and ongoing concerns about the activities of large multinational corporations, and the amount of contextual information we need to read it is enormous. When viewing this advertisement, you may or may not have access to all of this background information.
Your interpretation of this spoof advertisement therefore depends on your recognition or not of at least some of the current controversies, your attitudes towards them, and perhaps your attitudes to advertising in general. Your experience of such texts and indeed any other text is dependent also on your cultural context, and social and political factors: you may be fully aware of the opposition to McDonald's but think it entirely unreasonable.
We return later to this point in Reading B, where the meanings of the words and images in postcolonial picturebooks are discussed. I now turn to some ways in which semiotic analysis can illuminate the creative nature of visual elements of literature and poetry. The remainder of this section looks firstly at visual aspects such as letterforms, punctuation and layout, and secondly at concrete poetry. Section 3 broadens out to consider literary works of fiction which use illustrations and images to convey meaning, although there will be some overlap between the two sections.
Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University. Take a look at all Open University courses. If you are new to university level study, find out more about the types of qualifications we offer, including our entry level Access courses and Certificates. Not ready for University study then browse over free courses on OpenLearn and sign up to our newsletter to hear about new free courses as they are released.
Every year, thousands of students decide to study with The Open University. OpenLearn works with other organisations by providing free courses and resources that support our mission of opening up educational opportunities to more people in more places. All rights reserved. The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to its secondary activity of credit broking.
Skip to main content.
Search for free courses, interactives, videos and more! This difference can lead metonymy to seem more 'natural' than metaphor. Any attempt to represent reality can be seen as involving metonymy, since it can only involve selection and yet such selections serve to guide us in envisaging larger frameworks.
Synecdoche is a form of metonymy in which a part stands for the whole or vice versa a policeman is 'the law'; London is 'the smoke'; workers are sometimes called 'hands'; 'I've got a new set of wheels'. It is not easy to make a sharp distinction between metonymy and synecdoche. A typical instance of this was the furious argument they had about the Silk Cut advertisement Every few miles, it seemed, they passed the same huge poster on roadside hoardings, a photographic depiction of a rippling expanse of purple silk in which there was a single slit, as if the material had been slashed with a razor.
There were no words in the advertisement, except for the Government Health Warning about smoking.
This ubiquitous image, flashing past at regular intervals, both irritiated and intrigued Robyn, and she began to do her semiotic stuff on the deep structure hidden beneath its bland surface. It was in the first instance a kind of riddle. That is to say, in order to decode it, you had to know that there was a brand of cigarettes called Silk Cut.
The poster was the iconic representation of a missing name, like a rebus.
But the icon was also a metaphor. The shimmering silk, with its voluptous curves and sensuous texture, obviously symbolized the female body, and the elliptical slit, foregrounded by a lighter colour showing through, was still more obviously a vagina. The advert thus appealed to both senual and sadistic impulses, the desire to mutilate as well as penetrate the female body.
Vic Wilcox spluttered with outraged derision as she expounded this interpretation.
He smoked a different brand himself, but it wasas if he felt his whole philosophy of life was threatened by Robyn's analysis of the advert. Silk Cut. It's a picture of the name. Nothing more or less. He forced a laugh to cover his embarrassment. You're always trying to find hidden meanings in things.
A cigarette is a cigarette. A piece of silk is a piece of silk. Why not leave it at that? Semiotics teaches us that. The way the tobacco leaf is cut.
Like "Player's Navy Cut" - my uncle Walter used to smoke them. It's a metaphor, a metaphor that means something like, "smooth as silk". Somebody in an advertising agency dreamt up the name "Silk Cut" to suggest a cigarette that would'nt give you a sore throat or a hacking cough or lung cancer. But after a while the public got used to the name, the word "Silk" ceased to signify, so they decided to have an advertising campaign to give the brand a high profile again. Some bright spark in the agency came up with the idea of rippling silk with a cut in it.
The original metaphor is now represented literally. Whether they conciously intended or not doesn't really matter. It's a good example of the perpetual sliding of the signified under a signifier, actually. Wilcox chewed on this for a while, then said, 'Why do women smoke them, then, eh? One of the fundamental tools of semiotics is the distinction between metaphor and metonymy.
D'you want me to explain it to you?
Fours sense of "medium": media type, channel, mediation, environment. So it is at the connotative level of the sign that situational ideologies alter and transform signification. In association with psychoanalysis, semiotics also introduced the theory of 'the positioning of the subject' the spectator in relation to the filmic text Hayward 19, , Semiotics and post-Foucauldian discourse analysis does not deny the existence of real things or a world outside language and signs, nor of our need to describe a real world outside of language and mediation, but exposes our inability to give meaning to anything without the structuring preconditions of our systems of discourse and cultural sign systems. Key Terms in Semiotics.
In metaphor you substitute something like the thing you mean for the thing itself, whereas in metonymy you substitute some attribute or cause or effect of the thing for the thing itself'. The bottom bit is called the drag because it's dragged across the floor and the top bit is called the cope because it covers the bottom bit. What you didn't tell me was that "drag" is a metonymy and "cope" is a metaphor. I thought you were interested in how things work.
That's probably why you smoke them, actually. A cigarette is a cigarette as far as you are concerned.
It establishes a metonymic connection - completely spurious of course, but realistically plausible - between smoking that particular brand and the healthy, heroic, outdoor life of the cowboy. Buy the cigarette and you buy the lifestyle, or the fantasy of living it. I'm scared to go into a field with a cow in it. Self-reliant, independent, very macho. The metonymy attributes value to the testicles whereas the metaphor uses them to degrade something else.
Just a plain, ordinary cigarette? Understanding such codes, their relationships and the contexts in which they are appropriate is part of what it means to be a member of a particular culture. Indeed, Marcel Danesi has suggested that 'a culture can be defined as a kind of "macro-code", consisting of the numerous codes which a group of individuals habitually use to interpret reality' Danesi 18; see also Nichols These conventions are typically inexplicit, and we are not normally conscious of the roles which they play. Their use helps to guide us towards what Stuart Hall calls 'a preferred reading' and away from what Umberto Eco calls 'aberrant decoding', though media texts do vary in the extent to which they are open to interpretation see Fiske 86ff; The 'tightness' of semiotic codes themselves varies from the rule-bound closure of logical codes such as computer codes to the interpretative looseness of ideological codes.
John Corner suggests that loosely-defined 'codes' may not be usefully described as codes at all.